Displaying items by tag: Nicholas Hoult

JUROR #2

US, 2024, 114 minutes, Colour.

Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, Chris Messina, Zoe Deutch, Kiefer Sutherland, J.K.Simmons, Cedric Yarborough, Amy Aquino, Gabriel Basso.

Directed by Clint Eastwood.

A Clint Eastwood film. The multi-Oscar-winning director made this film when he was turning 93. A strong acting career, a musician, and then a director as he turned 40, and the extraordinary variety of themes, principally westerns, police dramas, psychological dramas, American history, the music…

As with one of his key moral-themed films, Gran Torino, this film is rather small-scale, from the American suburbs. But, as with many, it is a film of reality and conscience.

Nicholas Hoult plays Justin, a reformed alcoholic, married to the teacher (Zoe Deutch) who helped him in recovery, expecting a baby. Then he is called to jury duty, wanting out because of the imminent pregnancy but, as with other jurors who protest, is compelled to serve.

The case concerns the death of a woman, on the highway at night, her body down the cliff face. The accused is her partner, a violent man, drug convictions, and all the evidence against him, an argument in the bar, his pursuing her, the dark night.

There is an interesting supporting cast. Toni Collette is the determined prosecutor, believing in the guilt, but also involved in campaigning for political election. The defence lawyer, sympathetic to the man accused, is played by Chris Messina. Kiefer Sutherland plays a friend who runs the AA meetings and offers advice. J.K.Simmons is a retired policeman who decides to investigate aspects of the case himself.

But, in this setting, there are complications for Justin, juror #2. He realises that he was in the bar that night, remembers some of the interchange, was tempted to drink but didn’t, drove home disturbed, hit a deer on the road, had not thought about this afterwards. As he listens, disturbed, beginning to question what had happened that night, pressured by the discussions of the jurors, sensitive to his wife and the imminent birth, interactions with the prosecutor, the members of the jury going as a group to the site of the death…

It is interesting to see that Clint Eastwood after so many films has decided to go for a smaller scale drama, a look at family life, interactions and a small town, the significance of the law and jury duty and decisions, the conscience of the prosecutor who had a fixed opinion on guilt but is challenged by the lawyer for the defence and an interview with the accused, challenged to do her own investigations.

Justin is also challenged in his conscience and makes decisions. So, a challenge to the audience as well, sympathies, justice, conscience, extenuating circumstances, and Clint Eastwood leaving what could be his final film with a conscience-challenge to his audience.

1. The films of Clint Eastwood? Themes of justice, crime, police? Filmed in his 90s?
2. The Georgia setting, homes, the courts, bars, the countryside, the highway, the scene of the death? The musical score?
3. The title, the focus on Justin Kemp, his marriage, pregnant wife, the loss of earlier babies, the third trimester, his concern? The gradual revelation of his life, alcohol, the accident, rehabilitation and AA, the courts and social work, teaching, meeting his wife, the marriage? His reform, going to AA meetings, the encouragement of Larry Lasko? The chance encounter with the DEA?
4. The case, the accused, in the court, his manner, the flashbacks, his reputation, drug dealing, tattoos, his girlfriend, drinking in the bar, the argument, following her outside, the altercation, her leaving in the rain, his driving away? The evidence against him? The patrons videoing the altercation, played in court? His reputation? Driving away, the identification by the old man?
5. Justin, called to jury duty, his background of writing articles, not wanting to be away from his wife, the judge ordering him to stay, the other jurors and objections overruled? His sitting in the court, listening to the case, place in times, the beginnings of the flashbacks? The cumulative effect of the flashbacks, his reason for being in the bar, not drinking, upset, driving away, lack of attention, hitting what he thought was the deer, his looking around, driving away, no report? The issue of the repairs to the car and Faith checking out possible suspects, the visit to the house, Justin’s wife and her testimony?
6. The skills of the prosecution, her determination, personality, interactions with the defence counsel, her ambitions, the interviews, politics and her role? Her manner in the court, assured, convinced of guilt? The contrast with the defence counsel, his manner, presentation, the arguments, cross examinations? The role of the judge?
7. The effect on Justin, his conscience, his talking with the Larry? Larry giving the worst possible scenario? Later meeting with Larry, issues of conscience?
8. The personalities of the jurors, the jury taking charge in managing the discussions, the angry man and the death of his brother, condemnation of the accused? The variety of personalities, age, the discussions, the medical student and her analysis of the wounds?
9. The pressure on Justin, to protect himself, fairness to the accused being innocent? His raising questions after the almost unanimous decision? The range of discussions, angers, shifts of attitude, questions, the revival reliability of the old man and his identifying the accused? The weather, hit run? The interactions amongst themselves, the interactions with Justin?
10. The surprise that the verdict did not coming quickly? Justin, going home, reassurances for his wife, the tensions, her asking the truth?
11. The request to visit the site, the strictures, in the bus, the angry juror and his eye on Justin, analysing the situation, the pressure on Justin? The need for a verdict?
12. The audience surprise at the verdict of guilty? Justin absent from the reading, being with his wife, the birth? The result for the prosecutor, defence, the prisoner himself, his declarations?
13. Faith, the discussions with the defence, his pleading that the accused was not a murderer, the issue of the juror, former policeman, his contributions, going to the scene of the death, aware that Justin was there, his collecting all the documents about repairs? Including Justin’s? Justin contriving to drop the documents, the consequences, the former policeman dismissed? Justin to stay?
14. Faith, her checking out the repairs, the interview with Justin’s wife, the aftermath of the decision, her discussions with Justin outside? The meeting with the accused and the defence present, her checking whether she believed him guilty or not?
15. Her success, her role as DA? Her conscience, justice?
16. The audience’s attitude toward Justin, saving himself, the guilty verdict, his attitude towards the accused?
17. The final moment of the film, the knock on the door, faith present, the focus on Justin? His wife and the baby? The future?

SUPERMAN 

US, 2025, 129 minutes, Colour.

David Corenswet, Nicholas Hoult, Rachel Brosnahan, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, Isabella Merced, Wendell Pierce, Skye Gisondo, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Frank Grillo.

Directed by James Gunn.

Here is a Superman movie for the 21^st-century – although, we realise that we have already had a 21^st-century Superman in the form of Henry Cavill, his action in Gotham city but also his participation in the action of the Justice League. (And, those older, thinking back to the comic strips and comic books, may remember the black-and-white films of the 1940s with George Reeves but, with great fondness, the Superman presence of Christopher Reeve.)

This time Superman is a David Corenswet, who looks somewhere in between Christopher Reeve and Henry Cavill. But, the action is updated to the present. We do get flashbacks to Superman’s parents and their sending him to earth and the message for him to be a man of peace. And we do get flashbacks to the Kent family and the wise advice of his earthly foster father. And, this time, a significant character is Superman’s dog, called Krypton. And he does get involved significantly in the action.

And there is Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, a touch antagonistic but also in love, making demands in interviews with Superman. And, there is the editor of the Daly Planet and Jimmy Olsen. Still familiar.

And, as we expect, the villain is Lex Luthor, played arrogantly by a bald Nicholas Hoult, but this time a villain of the 21^st-century involved in all kinds of AI, manipulating complex social media outlets for fake and destructive news, defence systems, a power hungry villain with a considerable staff with all kinds of technological expertise.

But, this time there are alternate universes, strange places and atmospheres, Lex Luthor manipulating, imprisoning, overpowering Superman. But, this time Superman is not alone. Coming in from the Justice League is Green Lantern, as well as a few other characters with superpowers, Mr Terrific, Metamorpho, Hawkgirl.

For audiences not in the know, this can be quite confusing. Probably the best thing is to sit back, relax when possible, take the action and characters as they come, be amazed at the overreaching ambitions of Lex Luthor, especially as he unleashes a terrifying power that cuts through Manhattan, a vast rift, buildings collapsing – and, definitely the need for Superman to the rescue as well as his support team.

And, it seems, that this update of the franchise has proven very popular.

1. The long history of DC comics, early films, cereals, television series, the range of films from the 1970s, Christopher Reeve, Henry Cavill? His expectations?
2. The work of the director, Guardians of the Galaxy, writing and directing this film? The basis on DC comics in more recent decades?
3. Audience awareness of Superman, Krypton, his parents, sent to earth, the farewell message? The recreation of these sequences here?
4. The opening, the play on 30 and three, tracing Superman coming from Krypton?
5. Superman, Clark Kent, working at the Daily Planet, his knowing Lois Lane, relationship with her, the significance of the initial interview, his own story, her questions, the tension between them, resolution? The editor, Jimmy Olsen as the enthusiastic reporter? The, her relationship with Lex Luthor, infatuation with Jimmy?
6. Lex Luthor, a 21^st-century interpretation, age, appearance, bald, technological skills, his range of associates in his office, the IT, advice, support? Wanting to capture Superman, his dog, getting the code, capturing and imprisoning Superman? Creating the counterbalance, Ultraman? Their eventually confronting each other, Superman discovering his alter ego, the fighting, destroying his alter ego?
7. Luthor and his plans of power, narcissistic, psychopathic behaviour?
8. Superman, David Corenswet’s interpretation, his relationship to the dog, the many dog sequences?
9. The capture of Superman, the Pocket Universe, Superman and his weaknesses, his strengths, with or and the interview with Superman, the public holding him in regard, his strength to help people, the reinterpretation, putting on a bad light, people turning against him, criticisms, disillusionment?
10. The squad helping Superman, Green Lantern and his personality, Mr Terrific, his style, Metamorpho and his situation, powers, Hawkgirl? The tradition of the DC comics, their participation in the action, stepping in and helping Superman?
11. The public, the creation of the rift, the special effects showing the rift pursuing the city, the collapse of the buildings, disaster…? Closing the rift, Mr terrific?
12. Superman, the struggle with himself, the escape, the help of the squad, the collaboration with Lois, with the editor, with Jimmy, the role of Eve, her disillusionment with Lex Luthor, his treatment of her, her making contact, the sending of the information, the unmasking of Lex Luthor?
13. The final resolution, the heroes, Superman and Lois and the kiss, the cousin coming in, the return of the dog. And sequels?

THE ORDER

US, 2024, 116 minutes, Colour.

Jude Law, Nicholas Hoult, Tyler Sheridan, Jurnee Smollett, Walter Slezak, Odessa Young Alison Oliver.

Directed by Justin Kurzel.

The events in this investigative thriller took place in the 1980s. But, a film about extreme right-wing groups in the United States in the 2020s will immediately alert audiences to the attack on the American capital, January 6th, 2021. And, in fact, at the end of the film, the link is made.

The name, The Order is taken from the 1977 novel by William L.Pierce, the Turner Diaries, seemingly intended for younger readers but something of a manual for an uprising against the state, and how it is achieved in stages. This book features in the film highlighting its influence. Already, in 1988, there was a film about these events, Betrayed, directed by Costa Gavras and featuring Tom Berenger and Debra Winger. Early in 1989, the book on which this film is based was published. Its title, The Silent Brotherhood: Inside an American Racist Conspiracy, by Kevin Flynn and Gary Gerhardt. Kevin Flynn is noted in the credit as a consultant for the film.

The film has been directed by Justin Kurzel, well noted for his crime dramas and his skill in portraying mentally and emotionally disturbed men – especially in Australia, The Snow Twown, The True Story of the Kelly Gang, Nitram (and not forgetting his Macbeth).

The framework of this story is the investigation by FBI agent, Terry Husk, a fine role for Jude Law, one of his best (his role before this one as the ageing Henry VIII in The Firebrand). He works in collaboration with an earnest young deputy, Jamie Bowen, played by Tye  Sheridan, and a local agent played by Jurnee Smollett. The setting is Washington State – so much of the scenery, the mountains, filmed beautifully as background.

At the centre of the brotherhood is a young enthusiast, all-American, Bob Matthews. This is a very interesting and different performance by Nicholas Hoult who resembles closely the photos of Matthews himself, at times baby faced, an innocent despite the prejudices and violence he is spouting (scenes of his intensity in close-up looking like Nicholas Hoult more than 20 years earlier as a boy in About the Boy). The actual Bob Matthews, we find there is a strong resemblance between him and Nicholas Hoult.

Terry Husk has his own personal problems, his long career, sometimes an intense recklessness in pursuing the criminals. Matthews has the support of his wife, of his pregnant girlfriend, of a lot of the Proud Boy types of the 1980s, moving to bank robberies, explosions to distract from the robberies, a Bricks job on the highway, building up his coffers to start a militia. The screenplay also emphasises the biblical underlining of this Brotherhood, the transfer of promised land to the Jews (to be taken away from them), to the white Americans who see themselves as God’s chosen people, ready to rise up against any immoral society and a two-permitting government.

The pace is strong. The characterisation powerful. The issue is more than challenging. And, while it is a reminder of movements in the past, The Unibomber, bombings in Oklahoma, Waco… It is a sober alert to movements, beliefs, conspiracy theories in Trump’s America.

1. The title, the reference to the book, The Turner Diaries, the manual for insurrections and the group called The Order?
2. The film based on fact, the 1980s, the book basis for the film, The Silent Brotherhood? The popularity of white supremacist groups at this time? The Reagan era? The social standing of members of the group, white groups, the biblical basis, church preachers, neo-Nazi attitudes, the active leaders and insurrection, turning to crime to finance militias?
3. The settings, Idaho, Washington state, the beauty of the mountain scenery? The city sequences, the streets, banks, porn cinema and explosions, homes, the church, the highways and robberies?
4. The focus Terry Husk, Jude Law’s performance, FBI background, moving to Idaho, the phone call and the separation from his wife and daughters, his long experience, long friendship with Joanne Carney, working with her, her authority and jurisdiction, tested by Husk and his taking initiatives? The work together, investigations?
5. The focus on the group, Richard Butler, as a church minister, his ideology, preaching, the Bible, white supremacist presuppositions about the land, anti-Semitic, swastikas and neo-Nazi attitudes? His meetings with Bob Matthews, the threats, Matthew standing up to him at the gathering, his withdrawing?
6. Bob Matthews, his background, age, manner, relationship with his wife, relationship with his girlfriend, her pregnancy? His friends, their thug background? Interviewing the Mexican who pretended he was Spanish for racial supremacy? His hold over the men, his leadership? Later, the arrest and Husk interviewing and getting information?
7. The decision to rob banks, the money, for themselves, but for funding a militias? The sequence of the robbing of the bank, intimidation, the driver and the getaway, his gun on the policeman outside, their exhilaration? Matthews and his wife and his girlfriend? The planting of the bomb in the cinema, a distraction, the robbery of the van? The bigger plans, the Brinks van, on the highway, the hold-up, cars on the highway, the chain across the road, their effectiveness, the dangers, guns and shooting, escape?
8. The local police, the chief, rather more easy-going, Jamie Bowen, his earnestness, relationship with his wife, children? Giving information to Husk? Husk relying on him, going to the motel, the stakeout, the gun, Jamie freezing, Husk and his reaction? His change, becoming more involved, going into action? Husk and the interview with his wife and her fear of him? The confrontation, the shootout, the chase, Jamie shot, his death? The funeral, Husk, Jamie’s wife?
9. The focus on Bob Matthews, his personality, relationships, his plans, his wife, unable to have children, the young girlfriend and the birth of the child, the money for them? Husk and his interview, getting information, the location for hide out?
10. The impact of the church gathering, Butler speaking, Matthews intervening, powerful speech, bigotry?
11. The hideout, the thugs, guard, the FBI attacked, the siege, the shooting? The fire, Bob Matthews staying, Husk going into the building, withdrawing, the collapse of the building, Matthews’ death?
12. Husk and his achievement, Joanne Carney and her work, the regrets for the death of Jamie Bowen? The atmosphere of uprisings in the 1980s?
13. The final information, the references to January 6th, the siege of the Capitol, The Proud Boys and other groups, imprisonment, President Trump pardoning them – and the future during the second Trump presidency?

NOSFERATU

US, 2024, 133 minutes, Colour.

Lily-Rose Depp, Nicholas Hoult, Bill Skarsgaard, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Willem Dafoe, Emma Corrin, Ralph Ineson, Simon McBurney.

Directed by Robert Eggers.

Nosferatu was the title of the early film version of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, 1922, Germany, vivid black-and-white photography, angles, framing, Expressionist. The title was also used in 1979 for Werner Hertzog’s version of the story and tribute to the 1922 film. Now, a 2024 version, once again the tribute to the 1922 film, not only tribute but incorporating many of its visual aspects, and directed by Robert Eggers, only a few films so far in his career, but atmospheric, the Witch, The Lighthouse, The Northman.

Since the 1920s, there have been Dracula and vampire films every decade, some serious, many British, some parodies, even the recent Renfield with Nicolas Cage’s Dracula, also featuring Nosferatus, Nicholas Hoult.

We are in Germany, 1838, wonderful recreation of the town, the streets and ambience, the homes, elegance. There is a very strong supporting British cast including Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Emma Corrin, Ralph ineson, Simon McBurney. There is also a lot of strong dialogue throughout, the point of view of the rationalist who does not believe in the supernatural contrasting with those who do believe and those who are pragmatic faced with unexplained phenomena.

The question can be raised, why another Dracula film in 2024. And will it contribute to an appreciation of the Dracula and vampire legends?

The first attempt at an answer is to consider this film as a drama apart from the horror. The focus is on a young woman, Ellen, Lily-Rose Depp in a striking and physically and emotionally demanding performance. She dreams, has mystical experiences, is in love, makes a pact – which, in fact, will be a diabolical pact. But, she has the possibility of living a normal life, marrying Thomas (Nicholas Holut), hope that he will support and save her. But, he is commissioned by his manager to travel to Romania to negotiate with a mysterious Count Orloc who wants to buy a Castle in the German town. Ellen is fearful as Thomas leaves, and rightly so…

There is mysterious drama, Thomas finding himself in a strange village, superstitious villagers, and then his encounter with the Count.

And the second attempt at and some is to consider the film as horror. The atmosphere at the castle is more than eerie, the suggestions of the malevolent presence of the Count, his face, his behaviour and cruelty, his threats, diabolical consequences. Is played by Bill Skarsgaard as monstrous Some direct horror scenes but always the sense of horror menace. And, when Thomas returns home, the psychological disturbances in Ellen and her erratic behaviour, the count killing his friend’s wife and child, the discussions with an expert (Willem Dafoe) and the explanations of vampire behaviour. And, as well, the town is besieged by a plague of rats. And, Ellen’s disturbed dreams, erotic menace and horror, the unmasking of the Count.

And so, we can ask what are the comparisons with other versions of the story, how well these variations work as drama and horror, and how we are immersed in a world of evil destroying hope and love.

1. The literary tradition of Dracula and Nosferatu, the late 19^th century, Bram Stoker’s novel? The cinema tradition, the 1922 version, the English language tradition of Dracula, serious films, horror films, comedy and parodies? Werner Hertzog and Nosferatu 1979, homage to the 1922 version? This 2024 version, homage, reworking the particular perspectives of the writer-director?
2. Audience familiarity with the story, the traditions, the variations? This version changing the names of the characters, the German city? Drawing on the basic ideas and themes from Bram Stoker and the Nosferatu films?
3. The style of filmmaking? The importance of colour, colour grading, black-and-white, vivid colour, scenes tinted, unsaturated colour, but sometimes with bright highlights? The overall impact of this colour experience? The framing of the film, the angles, the homage to the 1922 version, using its styles? The style of the dialogue, old classical style, all, sometimes arch and artificial, placing the audience in the period, Germany, 1838? The film presented as a modern interpretation of old filmmaking styles?
4. The framework, Ellen, young, the focus on her face, her calling out to the vampire to come to her? Her age, her commitment, her dreams, her melancholy, psychological states? The years passing, her marriage to Thomas, happiness, yet her melancholy, fears, love, his going away, her anxieties? Staying with Richard and Anna? Her dreams, her moods, their concern, a sense of what was happening to Thomas while away, the coming of the mysterious lover? The doctor, his concern, treatment, seeking out of Professor von Frantz, his diagnosis, treatment? Further dreams, the return of Thomas, the sexual encounter and her wanting love, the continuing menace of the mysterious shadow, the shadow coming to the house, overcoming her, the sexual encounter, the sun rising, her commitment, his sacrificing himself for her love?
5. The title, the focus on the vampire, the estate agent, Knock and his eagerness, Count Orloc wanting the house, sending Thomas, the buildup of financial advantage, for his marriage? Knock, his madness, in servitude to Nosferatu, his madness, in the cell, confrontations, killing the guard, the interview with the professor and the doctor? Death? The plague?
6. Count Orloc, in Ellen’s visions, the Shadow, skeletal, the long fingers and nails, Thomas arriving at the village, the village people and their fears, the atmosphere, singing and dancing, yet warnings, was going to the Castle, walking in the snow, the carriage, his experience in the Castle, overwhelmed by the count, violence, blood, his debilitation, escape, taken by the nuns, the Orthodox religious ceremonies, his leaving, out of the power of the Count, his return, debilitated, with the doctor, the professor, Richard, Anna’s death, the plague?
7. The Count, the voyage, in the container, the sailors, the Captain, the rats, the plague, the deaths, the ship arriving in the Port, the dispersion of the rats, the plague and deaths, deaths in the street? The Count, visiting Anna, her being pregnant, the blood? His attack on the two daughters, the deaths, Richard and the burials? The mausoleum and his visits?
8. The doctor, his concern, medical help, friendship with Richard, the reputation of the professor, going to visit him, persuading him to join in? The professor, his personality, reputation, researchers, the occult? The visits to Anna? The visits to Ellen? Thomas’ return? Richard and his scepticism?
9. Richard, friendship with Thomas, lending the money, Richard and his wife, the family, the boisterous two daughters, in the shipping business? His scepticism about the professor, the support of the doctor, his narrations, the death of the family, the burials?
10. The buildup to confronting the Count, the three nights, his approaching the town, coming to Ellen, her trying to resist? The scenes of his possession of her, her not being herself, her face, the town, Thomas and his shock?
11. Thomas and his determination, hurrying to the mausoleum, expecting the vampire, discovering Knock, his madness and death, through the heart?
12. The hurrying back, the encounter with Ellen, the sun rising, remains of the creature, Thomas and his grief, in the final image of Ellen and the remains of Nosferatu?

THE GARFIELD MOVIE

US, 2024, 101 minutes, Colour.

Voices of: Chris Pratt, Samuel L.Jackson, Hannah Waddingham, Ving Rhames, Nicholas Hoult, Cecily Strong, Harvey Guillen, Snoop Dogg.

Directed by Mark Dindal.

Garfield the cat.

Once upon a time, the 1970s, Jim Davis created the cartoon, soon on television, computer games, Garfield. Then upon a time, 20 years ago, two feature films with Bill Murray as the voice of Garfield. Now upon a time, 2024, a big budget animated feature with a strong voice cast led by Chris Pratt as Garfield.

Garfield has been described as “greedy, but with a heart of gold”. On the evidence of this film, “gluttonous” (and the fastest gluttony we have ever seen on screen) would be more appropriate. And, as regards the heart of gold, this is not immediately evident, Garfield being very smug and self-satisfied – though, a bit of a spoiler, he is finally redeemed, glimpses of his potential heart of gold.

The story does go back to Garfield when little, abandoned by his street-cat father, Vic (Samuel L.Jackson), and the hungry little creature plaintive at the Italian restaurant window where his about-to-be strong friend, Jon (Nicholas Hoult) is having a lonely meal, opens the window, in comes Garfield and the pizza immediately and instantly munched! The beginning of a beautiful friendship.

Jon and his engaging little dog, Odie, have long been popular in the cartoons. Jon, is the most tolerant of owners, and Odie the most generous of friends, setting up Garfield with heaps (understatement) of food, comfortable armchair, watching Catflix, not a care in the world.

Where could this story possibly go – actually, into quite a lot of action and plot, the story Vic and his entanglement with a British vanity ring cat, Jinx (Hannah Waddingham), a plot to steal a milk truck, a tough police chief called Marge Malone (Cecily Strong), a bull in love (Ving Rhames) and Jinx’s thugs. In fact, plenty of action, the truck getaway, police pursuit, and everyone on a train hurtling towards a bridge.

The emotional key to the story is Garfield’s resentment towards his father leaving, his discovering more of the truth about Vic, reconciliation and happiness – and plenty of food with Jon discovering that he had paid thousands of dollars for drones with food to repel the enemy on the train!

(Which means that this reviewer enjoyed a lot more of Garfield than anticipated!)