Displaying items by tag: Rachel Brosnahan

SUPERMAN 

US, 2025, 129 minutes, Colour.

David Corenswet, Nicholas Hoult, Rachel Brosnahan, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, Isabella Merced, Wendell Pierce, Skye Gisondo, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Frank Grillo.

Directed by James Gunn.

Here is a Superman movie for the 21^st-century – although, we realise that we have already had a 21^st-century Superman in the form of Henry Cavill, his action in Gotham city but also his participation in the action of the Justice League. (And, those older, thinking back to the comic strips and comic books, may remember the black-and-white films of the 1940s with George Reeves but, with great fondness, the Superman presence of Christopher Reeve.)

This time Superman is a David Corenswet, who looks somewhere in between Christopher Reeve and Henry Cavill. But, the action is updated to the present. We do get flashbacks to Superman’s parents and their sending him to earth and the message for him to be a man of peace. And we do get flashbacks to the Kent family and the wise advice of his earthly foster father. And, this time, a significant character is Superman’s dog, called Krypton. And he does get involved significantly in the action.

And there is Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, a touch antagonistic but also in love, making demands in interviews with Superman. And, there is the editor of the Daly Planet and Jimmy Olsen. Still familiar.

And, as we expect, the villain is Lex Luthor, played arrogantly by a bald Nicholas Hoult, but this time a villain of the 21^st-century involved in all kinds of AI, manipulating complex social media outlets for fake and destructive news, defence systems, a power hungry villain with a considerable staff with all kinds of technological expertise.

But, this time there are alternate universes, strange places and atmospheres, Lex Luthor manipulating, imprisoning, overpowering Superman. But, this time Superman is not alone. Coming in from the Justice League is Green Lantern, as well as a few other characters with superpowers, Mr Terrific, Metamorpho, Hawkgirl.

For audiences not in the know, this can be quite confusing. Probably the best thing is to sit back, relax when possible, take the action and characters as they come, be amazed at the overreaching ambitions of Lex Luthor, especially as he unleashes a terrifying power that cuts through Manhattan, a vast rift, buildings collapsing – and, definitely the need for Superman to the rescue as well as his support team.

And, it seems, that this update of the franchise has proven very popular.

1. The long history of DC comics, early films, cereals, television series, the range of films from the 1970s, Christopher Reeve, Henry Cavill? His expectations?
2. The work of the director, Guardians of the Galaxy, writing and directing this film? The basis on DC comics in more recent decades?
3. Audience awareness of Superman, Krypton, his parents, sent to earth, the farewell message? The recreation of these sequences here?
4. The opening, the play on 30 and three, tracing Superman coming from Krypton?
5. Superman, Clark Kent, working at the Daily Planet, his knowing Lois Lane, relationship with her, the significance of the initial interview, his own story, her questions, the tension between them, resolution? The editor, Jimmy Olsen as the enthusiastic reporter? The, her relationship with Lex Luthor, infatuation with Jimmy?
6. Lex Luthor, a 21^st-century interpretation, age, appearance, bald, technological skills, his range of associates in his office, the IT, advice, support? Wanting to capture Superman, his dog, getting the code, capturing and imprisoning Superman? Creating the counterbalance, Ultraman? Their eventually confronting each other, Superman discovering his alter ego, the fighting, destroying his alter ego?
7. Luthor and his plans of power, narcissistic, psychopathic behaviour?
8. Superman, David Corenswet’s interpretation, his relationship to the dog, the many dog sequences?
9. The capture of Superman, the Pocket Universe, Superman and his weaknesses, his strengths, with or and the interview with Superman, the public holding him in regard, his strength to help people, the reinterpretation, putting on a bad light, people turning against him, criticisms, disillusionment?
10. The squad helping Superman, Green Lantern and his personality, Mr Terrific, his style, Metamorpho and his situation, powers, Hawkgirl? The tradition of the DC comics, their participation in the action, stepping in and helping Superman?
11. The public, the creation of the rift, the special effects showing the rift pursuing the city, the collapse of the buildings, disaster…? Closing the rift, Mr terrific?
12. Superman, the struggle with himself, the escape, the help of the squad, the collaboration with Lois, with the editor, with Jimmy, the role of Eve, her disillusionment with Lex Luthor, his treatment of her, her making contact, the sending of the information, the unmasking of Lex Luthor?
13. The final resolution, the heroes, Superman and Lois and the kiss, the cousin coming in, the return of the dog. And sequels?

THE AMATEUR

US, 2025, 123 minutes, Colour.

Rami Malek, Rachel Brosnahan, Jon Bernthal, Holt McCallany, Julianne Nicholson, Caitriona Balfe, Michael Stuhlbarg, Laurence Fishburne.

Directed by James Hawes.

Based on a novel by Newsweek reporter, Robert Littel, The Amateur was first filmed in 1981 with John Savage and Christopher Plummer. It was the era of popular spy novels by Robert Ludlum in one wit suggested that this version of The Amateur is “Bourne Again”! Not exactly, action sequences yes, but the central character here, Charlie Heller, played by Oscar winner Rame Malek (Bohemian Rhapsody as Freddie Mercury) would not necessarily be the first choice for an action hero!

In fact, he plays a highly skilled IT expert, perhaps of the “nerd” variety, at home in his sealed office and IT centre, making contacts, tracking, identifying voices, but also discovering that some of the CIA authorities are conducting illegal black ops.

This is where a film version of CIA action in the 1980s has to give considerable way to a version in the 2020s. The developments of IT, social networking, mobile phones, instant connections, instant surveillance, storage of information.

But, Charlie Heller has a loving relationship with his wife, Sarah, Rachel Brosnahan, her going to a meeting in London and to his shock and horror, grief and obsession, discovering that she has been killed during a robbery, offering herself as a hostage for someone else, being shot.

Acceptance of this reality is not the first response of Charlie Heller. Rather, he becomes obsessed with revenge.

As action films go, Charlie Heller’s determination, going through some rigorous CIA action training, but not very good with the gun, is a driving force in this action. And, as a bonus, the audience is treated to a wide range of location action, London, Paris, Marseille, Istanbul, in Romania, the Baltic coast… And Charlie, not only identifying who the villains are, especially the one who pulled the trigger, but he is able to track them down, them, destroy them.

However, as with so many action films, there is the issue of the plausibility, and then the question of credibility. With the action moving fast, what about realism and practical details of food, rest, toilet breaks, money in the pocket, the functioning or not of IT equipment, travel and air tickets…? Audiences accepting omissions because of the action?

As always, there are some moral questions, complications. The role of the CIA, illegal and secret black ops in the name of patriotism, these agents being held to account, International criminal gangs, ruthless business and murders, and, with Charlie Heller himself, the obsession of revenge, motivations of vengeance, and his setting up killings parallel to the set-ups by the villains. And, with Rami Malek the amateur action hero grieving the death of his wife, rather than an all-conquering beefed-up agent, there is also some emotional challenging.

1. Action level of the 1980s? Updating to the 2020s? The transition to the world of IT and espionage?
2. The international settings, Washington DC, London, Paris, Marseille, Istanbul, Turkish coast, Romania, the Russian coast? And the world of the CIA? The musical score?
3. The realism of the plot? Plausibility? Credibility? Practical details of food, rest, toilet breaks, money, close change, travel and air tickets…? Audiences accepting omissions because of the action?
4. The introduction to Charlie and Sarah, at home, ease with each other, love, his work on the plane, not travelling, her going to London? The contacts, the phone calls? And the various flashbacks during the film?
5. Charlie, going to work, his car, the cards, security, his workplace, computers, programming, espionage, his link with the mysterious corresponded, ears, guessing where he lived? Istanbul? And the later contact, revelation of the truth, the man being dead, his wife continuing the communications, Charlie going to her, her collaboration, his eyes in pursuit of the criminals? That they have covered, the siege, the attack, her death?
6. The robbery in London, the dramatics, on the television news, the details, the Chiefs informing Charlie, his reaction? His being seen as something of a nerd, his help with The bear, summoned by the Chiefs, his hold over them, his information about the illegal ops? There confronting him? The meetings with Chief O’Brien? The later investigations, interrogation of Moore, the lunch with him, their deceiving her?
7. Charlie, obsessed, the motivation, his phone, Internet connections, wanting to be trained, work Henderson, the discussions, shooting practice, Charlie and his limitations? Later Henderson being used, following him in Paris, to Marseille, the confrontations, Istanbul, the fight, his being wounded? And is later reappearing?
8. Charlie and his ability to identify the criminals, the techniques, voices and matches, images? His decision to track them down?
9. Money issues, motivation, the travel to London, information, to Paris, identifying the woman, at the gym, the suffocation, the fight, her escape, it by the van? Charlie and the bus to Marseille?
10. Marseilles, tracking down people, business of Henderson, the bar, getting information?
11. The criminal, the pool, his money, the swimming, Charlie and the confrontation, the dynamics of the pool, the water, the pressure, the interrogation, the threats, the explosion and the deluge?
12. Charlie, in Istanbul, the contacts, the information about Romania, his travel, the setting up of the cargo, the confrontation with the criminal, the threat, the explosives?
13. Information about Russia, the travel to the coast, seeing the criminals, the boat, his being abducted, the interrogation, the criminal giving him the gun, his inability to shoot, the criminal indicating Charlie’s motivations and setting up deaths?
14. The delay, in Finnish waters, the arrests? Charlie vindicated?
15. Washington, Director O’Brien, the arrests of the Chiefs, their illegal ops?
16. Charlie, the car, Henderson reappearing, his going home, flying the plane? Achievement?