Displaying items by tag: Leo Woodall

TUNER

Canada/US, 2025, 107 minutes, Colour.

Leo Woodall, Dustin Hoffman, Havana Rose Liu, Tovah Feldshuh, Lior Raz, Jean Reno, Herbie Hancock.

Directed by Daniel Roher.

In fact, there are two piano tuners, first, the young Niki, and second, the older Harry, veteran musician and tutor. Niki is played by Leo Woodall. And, the pleasure of seeing Dustin Hoffman as Harry. His is a cameo role but, in the minds of the filmmakers, his cameo is really a homage to him and his career (and, at the hospital, when asked the details of his life, the birthdate given is Dustin Hoffman’s actual birthdate).

But, Tuner begins with the characters in quite some difficulties. Niki, a young talented musician with perfect pitch, suffers from hyperacusis, finding loud noises intolerable, his having two years of therapy to try to adjust his hearing, having to wear earplugs. But, he is an expert tuner. Harry is his mentor, an old friend of Niki’s father, but his difficulty is age, also he can be very cheeky to everyone, but hospitalised and finding that he has not been keeping up his insurance payments.

Which offers the setting for something of a thriller and, when Niki encounters Ruthie (Hayley Rose Liu), a highly determined musician and composer, working on her piano, and egged on by Harry, the film is also a pleasant romance.

When Niki encounters a group of security guards one night when he is tuning a piano at the house of a wealthy client, it turns out that he has a skill in hearing the sounds as he unlocks safes. Not too unpredictable to work out what is about to happen. Our sympathies are with Niki and with Harry and his wife Maria (Tovah Feldshuh). And sympathies also with the payoffs that the security guards who target the owners of the homes they guard, just stealing enough to not draw attention to what they are up to. But, course, it can’t last. Ambitious criminals hire lower criminals to do their dirty work and a buildup to some dramatic confrontations.

In the meantime, Ruthie is working, often desperately, on her composition, intense in rehearsals, yet falling in love with Niki, it’s all building up. of course, to a dramatic conclusion and, a twist of fate in bringing the safecracking to an unexpected/expected conclusion.

New York setting, sympathetic characters, the real Herbie Hancock turning up at Harry’s funeral, and quite a lot of music, popular and concert performance throughout the film for an enjoyable thriller/romance.

1. The two tuners? Niki, memories of his father, working with Harry, Harry his mentor? The scenes of piano tuning, the skills, the sounds of the piano as a whole?
2. The New York setting, apartments, wealthy homes, diners, the music school, the auditorium? The safes, the safe breaking? The Maestro, his office, his home, the future? Hospital, recovery, Niki’s final play?
3. Niki, his age, the past, musician, hyperacusis, the impact of noise, his two years’ therapy, his wearing of earplugs? His pitch perfect work on the pianos? Demonstrating it? Seeing him at work, thorough? The interaction with clients? The bond with Harry, at home, with Maria, at the bar, Harry urging him on with Ruthie? Harry, the collapse, the visits to the hospital? Trying to support Maria?
4. The encounter with Ruthie, student, composer, her ambitions, energy, skills? The piano tuning, interactions with Niki? At the bar, carrying her books, walking her home? Influence of Harry? The gradual bonding between them, conversations, the music, her composing, practice, open to be employed by the Maestro? Falling in love? The visits to Harry? The intensity of the relationship, the clash, Ruthie and the composition, Niki’s suggestions, the falling out, the actual recital, Maria present, Niki absent, success, the Maestro, the watch, her approaching Niki?
5. Harry, tribute to Dustin Hoffman, personality, the past, musician, tuner, his death, the gathering, actual Herbie Hancock present?
6. Niki, the encounter with the security guards, interactions, his hearing, able to open safes? Their employing him, his moral dilemma, the money for Maria, the collage of opening the safes, the boss and his associates, Benny and the dog? The money, banking it for Maria? The thieves and their taking smaller items, items the owners would not notice missing?
7. The Korean gang, employing the security guards, their getting Niki, his refusal, the violence and pressure, success, the uncle arriving, forcing Niki to swallow the code? The later able to revive the code? The violence? Benny shooting?
8. The staging of the recital, Ruthie’s skill, the musicians, the Maestro, meeting her?
9. Niki, the violence, the hospital, his running to the recital, late? The issue of the watch, discussions with the Maestro, Ruthie working for him, his going to the game, recovering the watch and giving it back?
10. His recovery, the effect on his hearing, having to Ruthie again, his performance, Tenderly, his achievement? The future? And his comment that E flat was out of tune?

NUREMBERG

US, 2025, 148 minutes, Colour.

Russell Crowe, Rami Malek, Michael Shannon, Leo Woodall, John Slattery, Richard E.Grant, Colin Hanks, Lydia Peckham, Ben Miles, Lotte Verbeek, Mark O'Brien, Andreas Pietschmann.

Directed by James Vanderbilt.

80 years after the end of World War II, the name Nuremberg still evokes memories of the Nazi regime, the rallies in the 1930s, Lottie Riefenstahl is film Triumph of the Will, the location for the proclamation of anti-Semitic laws, and after World War II, the trials.

Cinemagoers and television viewers will have memories of the 1961 classic, Judgement at Nuremberg, and the 2000 television series, Nuremberg, with Brian Cox as Herman Goering. Here is a new take on the trials, focusing particularly on Goering and the American psychiatrists brought in to gauge the mental states of those accused, Douglas Kelly. There is also a focus on Justice Robert Jackson, his role in promoting the trials even though there were no legal precedents, the combining of Britain, France, the Soviet Union and the US to sit in legal judgements on these Nazi war criminals. The screenplay by writer-director, James Vanderbilt, draws on documentation and verbatims of speeches during the trials.

With the focus on Goering, a large man in real life, Russell Crowe fully embodies him (and Crowe, 25 years after Gladiator and his Oscar, can still dominate the screen). Physically, he is quite a contrast to the psychiatrist, Douglas Kelly, played by Oscar-winner Rami Malek. At the centre is a battle of wits, Goering able to combine charm with ruthlessness in his hyper-narcissistic personality, Kelly with psychiatric shrewdness but, in many ways, succumbing to the domination of Goering, an ambiguous friendship, bonding with Goering’s wife and daughter, but a final disillusionment.

Along with this focus on the two central characters, the screenplay provides the background to the raising of such issues as an international court, no legal precedent. And the need for international collaboration with Britain, France and the Soviet Union. At the centre is Justice Robert Jackson, a seriously sombre performance by Michael Shannon, earnest, committed – and with a surprising sequence where he goes to persuade Pius XII to support the trials, using the Pope’s concordat with the Nazi regime in 1933 as a persuasive point of power to gain the Pope’s assent.

Each of the central characters has powerfully dramatic moments. As do two of the supporting characters, standing out is Leo Woodall’s performance as Howie  Triest, Kelly’s translator, but revealing at the end his Jewish background and an impassioned narration of his persecuted life and his American commitment. And, Richard E.Grant also has a significantly dramatic scene, a short but cumulatively effective interrogation of Goering on the stand, brutally making Goering admit his continuing Nazi loyalties.

Older audiences will be familiar with so many of the details but, for later audiences, the device is used in the screenplay to have characters explain situations that they were discovering in 1945. And, the film here uses newsreel footage, re-enacted black-and-white footage. And, there is quite extensive footage, screened in Nuremberg at the trials, the horror of the prisoners in the concentration camps, the starvation and torture, the mounds of dead bodies, the bulldozers clearing… 80 years later still profoundly shocking.

With its focus on Goering and Kelly, Nuremberg is not the last war trials story but it does bring the past back to life – and, some of the speeches at the trial and an epilogue with Douglas Kelly in a radio program proclaiming that fascist groups and individuals can still flourish even if the neo-Nazis are not wearing uniforms. Today we know how true this is.

1. The title, expectations, memories of Nuremberg, the Nazi rallies, vast rally building, the post-war trials, significance in crimes against humanity? International collaboration?
2. Audience knowledge of the war, the Nazi regime, Hitler, Goering as his second-in-command, the concentration camps, the Holocaust, ideology, anti-Semitism, power? The explanations in the dialogue of the film to explain to the characters of the time and their new awareness, for later film audiences?
3. The film as drama, relying on documentation from the court case, the book about the psychiatrist and his encounters with the accused, the focus on Goering and the psychiatrist? The use of black and white news footage, re-created footage, especially the concentration camps?
4. The extensive scenes of the concentration camps, the dead, the bodies, the survivors, the bulldozers… The impact 80 years later?
5. The strong cast, the musical score?
6. Goering story, World War I, his wounds, commitment to Hitler, the 1920s into the 1930s, his role of command, his decisions, legislation, anti-Semitic, final solution, complete and total solution? Interactions with the other members of the Nazi regime? His plan for surrender, in the car with his wife and daughter, prison? His plan for control, to be centre-stage, to make his statement? The disappearance of his wife and daughter?
7. Douglas Kelly, psychiatrist, reputation, military, invited to deal with the war criminals, his personality, his shrewdness, analysis, knowing that Goering spoke English, the discussions with Howie, the translations, perceptions of Goering, narcissistic, control? Writing his notes, the plan for the book? The range of meetings with Goering, Howie present, alone with Goering, the letters, his decision to visit his wife and daughter, the letters, the return? The attachment, later visits, the daughter and the piano? And the personal discussions with Goering?
8. Justice Jackson, his personality, legal background, Supreme Court, his assistant, discussions about bringing the criminals to trial, the assistant and her legal arguments, no precedent, the need for International collaboration, not just America prosecuting in another country? The background of the discussions, Roosevelt and his stances, the Congress, variety of legal opinion, the socials and discussions? The visit to Pius XII, asking for support, quoting 1933, the Vatican and the concordat with the Nazis, the experience of the war, Pius XII and his reputation, the respectful discussion, the political blackmail? The support?
9. The preparations in Nuremberg, rebuilding the hall, preparations, the international judges, the media?
10. Colonel Andrus, in charge, his personality, the touch abrasive, not approving of Kelly, his attitude towards the prisoners? In Switzerland, the transfer to Nuremberg? The cells, no amenities, the beds, mattress, toilets, to prevent suicides? Goering is, that they were German built?
11. Jackson, coming to Nuremberg, the audience contemplating the issues through him, his speeches, the meeting with Maxwell Fyfe? The support of his assistant?
12. The other accused, the presentation of who they were, their background, war crimes, anti-Semitism, their personalities? The reaction to imprisonment, assertion? The arrival of Hess, his salute, claiming amnesia, the time in Scotland? Interactions with Goering, pretending not to know him? Kelly using Goering to get information about Hesse? Using the letters as persuasion?
13. Kelly, on the train, the magic, the card tricks, the journalist, meeting her, his drinking, the interview with her, the headlines, the colonel dismissing him? At the station, returning home, Howie at the station, the powerful scene with Howie, explanation of his past, German, Jewish, escape, the United States, enlisting, wanting to bring down the criminals? The influence on Kelly, accused of not doing anything, his book, giving it to Jackson to prepare the case? His coming to the court?
14. Kelly and his interaction with the various criminals, discussions, the Rorschach tests, the responses and indications of their psychology, especially Kelly’s comments on Goering’s responses?
15. The arrival of Dr Gilbert, brash style, clashes with Kelly, suggesting writing a book together, the blonde information to Goering about his wife and daughter being taken, the fight with Dr Gilbert?
16. The trial opening, the accused, Goering delaying in standing and sitting, centre of attention? Jackson, his speeches, his interrogation of Goering, verbal fencing, accuracy, precision of dates, quibbling about translations? Jackson and his sense of failing (and not being appointed to the Supreme Court)? Maxwell Fyfe, his asking the question, the powerful sequence of his interrogation, Goering’s responses, going through the history of the Third Reich, Goering accepting it, the final question about still being loyal to Hitler? The defeat of Goering?
17. Kelly, the final visit to Goering, and the background of the magic trick, Goering and the cyanide pill, his suicide?
18. The hour for the executions, sudden, not letting the accused is one, no drugs, the test case, tantrum, Howie dressing him, escorting him to the gallows, Howie and the personal antagonism towards the accused, the hanging?
19. Kelly, the radio interviews, his book, drinking, assertions, the reactions? And the final sequence of him walking along the corridor, drunk, and his depression and suicide, cyanide pill?
20. The final information, the consequence of the Nuremberg trials, new standards for Justice and the law for crimes against humanity?

BRIDGET JONES: MAD ABOUT THE BOY

UK, 2025, 124 minutes, Colour.

Renée Zellweger, Chiwital Ejiofer, Leo Woodall, Hugh Grant, Colin Firth, Mila Jankowicz, Casper Knopf, Sally Phillips, Nico Parker, Sarah Solemani, Shirley Henderson, James Callis, Claire Skinner, Isla Fisher, Gemma Jones, Emma Thompson, Jim Broadbent, Neil Pearson, Celia Imre.

Directed by Michael Morris.

Bridget Jones came on the cinema scene almost a quarter of a century ago two very successful films. She was immediately popular, embodied in a British style by American actress Renée Zellweger. In 2016, she had a baby and another film. In 2024-2025, she is a widow, with two children at school, trying to manage, sad memories of her husband, played by Colin Firth and reappearing here in some pleasing ghostly presences. (Not too happy memories of previous films with real appearances of her parents, Jim Broadbent and Gemma Jones, and a number of old friends turning up, Sally Phillips, Shirley Henderson…).

Bridget Jones has been welcomed back by audiences – though, for many of us, her distinctive mannerisms, quirks of accent, tics of behaviour, can be often offputting or, at least, disconcerting.

So, what is the widow to do? Get some advice from her old friend-nemesis, Daniel, a welcome return by Hugh Grant, still the playboy attitude but soon to be threatened by age, illness, more than a touch of conscience, and a reconciliation with his absent Italian son.

She goes to Memorial dinners for her husband, gets loads of advice from her contemporaries, to be out and around, date, be on the market. She also gets her advice from her gynaecologist, Emma Thompson again, which is more grounded but not heeded until later.

What happens is that on Hampstead Heath, her children climb a tree, she tries to rescue them, and a handsome worker (Foxster, Leo Woodall) intervenes, she more than a touch smitten, he getting in contact, a whirlwind affair. Is this the answer to her longings? But is going back to work as a television producer, on a show for women and women’s issues, another answer?

By this stage, her fans will be hoping that she resolves life’s issues. But, in those who find her a bit offputting, not eliciting audience sympathy, would be tempted to give up on her.

But,   lifechanges, her toyboy puts his foot in it about age; she is still thinking of her husband; her children react, especially her son who misses his father. And she listens more attentively to her doctor’s advice.

And, there in the background is the teacher at the children’s school, Mr Willaker (a charming Chiwitel Ejiofor, despite his propensity for discipline and continually blowing his whistle, loudly).

So, gradually, some sensible moralising, some more considered choices, some sensible interactions, and Bridget Jones will have a future.

1. Popularity Bridget Jones, Renée Zellweger’s presence and performance? Mannered style? Over almost 25 years and four films?
2. The London settings, home, school, television studios? House parties, large parties, the range of songs?
3. Bridget’s situation, widow, the death of her husband, charity work and his death, Colin Firth, his presence in memories throughout the film? The two children, their ages, her bond with the children, at school? Her going out to the Memorial dinner for her husband, her awkwardness? With the of the mothers, the Society mother, getting her to join in the activities and her later doing this?
4. Memories of her dying father, his urging her to go out? Memories of her mother? The visit to the doctor, practical, urging her out?
5. At school, encountering Mr Waliker, his whistle, his manner, with the children, stern? Later talks with him, his teaching science, rational, his criticisms of Billy’s work?
6. The outings, with the children, climbing the tree, Roxster and his presence, climbing and rescuing them, Mr Waliker observing?
7. The relationship with Roxster, his age, his work, his manner, the effect on Bridget? Tentative, going out, her infatuation, the beginning of the relationship, a fling? The effect on her? On the children? Especially Billy? Memories of his father? The party, the dog, in the water, Roxster diving in, the wet shirt, the reaction of Bridget’s friends?
8. The range of friends, from the past, new friends, meetings, chatting, urging her to enjoy herself and break out?
9. Daniel, from the previous films, the Hugh Grant’s style, his babysitting and bond with the children, his own life, his illness, in the hospital, the talk with Bridget, the talk about his son? And the son arriving at the party, charming, Daniel more at peace?
10. Roxster, time of the relationship, his backing out, not communicating, later return, his mention of time travel, indicating she be younger, her retort that he should come into the future with her? The break?
11. The work of the television station, the program, the focus on women, the guests, the personalities, the producer, Bridget enjoying her work, talking about her relationship and finding herself on stage with the applause?
12. Chloe as the nanny, her being recommended by friends, her role in the house, her ideas, efficient in every way, bonding with the children, the perfect nanny? Bridget finally accepting her?
13. Bridget and her memories of her husband, going through the documents, the diary, writing the message to him, and with children and setting the balloons?
14. Mr Waliker and his class with parents, her setting up a television program, the girl with the chart, Billy and his apprehension, the discussion about fruit fly, turning the discussion to the presence of the soul, and another life after death?
15. The shift in emphasis from the atmosphere of the fling to more serious? With the children? The discussions with Mr Waliker, going on the walk with him, the rain, the discussions, issues of reason, imagination, magic? The effect on him, the change, still blowing the whistle, but in class? The importance of his talk with Billy? The cut, the return to the concert, Billy singing, I’ll do Anything, in memory of his father, to have a memory of his father, the enthusiastic response?
16. The visit to the doctor, her practical advice, common sensed, Bridget listening to it, memories of her father, discussions with her mother?
17. The change of atmosphere, the light and more permissive episodes with her friends and with Roxster? The change, the serious interactions with Mr Waliker?
18. A year later, happiness, a new beginning, Mr Waliker the piano, the friends, her mother, her future in her 50s and beyond?